Pay in installments of $11.90 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 23 - Jul 28
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
olaplex curl set no 4 en no 5 2x250mlHaben Sie Locken, die nach dem Waschen sofort kraus werden, austrocknen oder ihre Form verlieren? Die Olaplex Curl Set No. 4 en No. 5 2X250ml wurde speziell fr welliges bis krauses Haar entwickelt, das mehr braucht als ein gewhnliches Shampoo und eine Conditioner. Das Set besteht aus dem N4 CURL Hydrating Curl Shampoo (250 ml) und dem N5 CURL Bond Shaper Hydrating Curl Conditioner (250 ml). Gemeinsam reinigen und pflegen sie Ihre Locken von innen
Haben Sie Locken, die nach dem Waschen sofort kraus werden, austrocknen oder ihre Form verlieren? Die Olaplex Curl Set No. 4 en No. 5 - 2X250ml wurde speziell für welliges bis krauses Haar entwickelt, das mehr braucht als ein gewöhnliches Shampoo und eine Conditioner. Das Set besteht aus dem Nº4 CURL Hydrating Curl Shampoo (250 ml) und dem Nº5 CURL Bond Shaper Hydrating Curl Conditioner (250 ml). Gemeinsam reinigen und pflegen sie Ihre Locken von innen heraus, sodass sie sich geschmeidiger anfühlen, besser definiert sind und weniger kraus werden. Wenn Ihre Locken regelmäßig gefärbt, blondiert oder mit Hitze gestylt werden, ist dieses Duo genau das Richtige.
Was macht das Olaplex Curl Set No. 4 en No. 5 - 2X250ml besonders?
Dieses Set ist nicht einfach ein Shampoo und Conditioner für Locken. Beide Produkte enthalten die Olaplex-Technologie, die die im Haar durch Schäden gebrochenen Verbindungen repariert. Das spüren Sie sofort beim Waschen und auch in den folgenden Tagen.
- Locken fühlen sich schon nach der ersten Wäsche geschmeidiger an
- Weniger Krause, auch bei feuchtem Wetter
- Locken sind leichter kämmbar ohne vermehrten Haarbruch
- Reinigt, ohne das Haar auszutrocknen
- Siliconfrei und sulfatfrei
- Geeignet für Wellen, Locken und krauses Haar (Typ 2 bis 4)
- Hilft beschädigtes Haar nach Färben oder Hitzestyling zu reparieren
- Conditioner lässt das Haar luftig wirken, nicht schwer oder fettig
Wie verwende ich das Olaplex Curl Set?
- Waschen Sie Ihr Haar unter der Dusche gründlich nass.
- Geben Sie eine großzügige Menge Nº4 CURL Hydrating Curl Shampoo in das nasse Haar und massieren Sie es gut in die Kopfhaut ein.
- Spülen Sie gründlich aus, bis keine Shampoo-Reste mehr im Haar sind.
- Tragen Sie danach den Nº5 CURL Bond Shaper Hydrating Curl Conditioner von der Mitte bis zu den Spitzen auf. 2 bis 3 Minuten einwirken lassen.
- Ausspülen und wie gewohnt stylen.
Möchten Sie Ihre Locken nach dem Waschen noch mehr definieren? Das Bond Shaper Curl Defining Gel No.10 ist der logische nächste Schritt. Sie arbeiten es nach dem Conditioner ins nasse Haar ein, damit Ihre Locken schön geformt und mit weniger Krause trocknen.
Warum wirkt dieses Curl-Shampoo und der Conditioner so gut?
Ihre Locken fühlen sich nach der Anwendung kräftiger an und sehen besser definiert aus. Das liegt daran, dass die Produkte die im Haar durch Schäden gebrochenen Verbindungen reparieren. Lockiges Haar hat von Natur aus mehr Biegungen, und an jeder Biegung gibt es einen Bruchpunkt. Das Nº4 CURL reinigt, ohne diese Bruchstellen weiter zu schädigen. Das Nº5 CURL ergänzt dann die Feuchtigkeit, die Ihr Haar braucht, um geschmeidig und elastisch zu bleiben. Beide Produkte sind frei von Siliconen und beschweren das Haar auch bei häufiger Anwendung nicht. Olaplex ist seit Jahren für diese Methode bekannt, und die Curl-Linie bringt diese Technologie speziell für lockiges Haar. Eine clevere Wahl bei geschädigten oder trockenen Locken.
Ist das Olaplex Curl Set für Ihren Lockentyp geeignet?
Ja, das Set funktioniert für alle Lockentypen von leichten Wellen bis enge Coils. Haben Sie Typ 2 oder 3 Haar, das nach dem Waschen schnell kraus wird oder austrocknet? Dann bemerken Sie schon nach wenigen Wochen mehr Geschmeidigkeit und bessere Definition. Haben Sie Typ 4 Haar, das brüchig wirkt oder durch Blondieren oder Hitze beschädigt ist? Dann unterstützt die bond-reparierende Wirkung beider Produkte Ihr Haar dabei, kräftiger zu werden.
Sehr fein lockiges Haar? Verwenden Sie den Conditioner dann nur von der Mitte bis in die Spitzen, nicht auf der Kopfhaut, damit das Haar nicht beschwert wird. Vergleichen Sie dieses Set mit dem normalen Hair Repair Set Nr. 3 Plus, Nr. 4 & Nr. 5? Dieses richtet sich mehr auf allgemeine Schadensreparatur. Das Curl Set ist spezifischer formuliert mit Texturen und Inhaltsstoffen, die Locken geschmeidiger, glatter und besser definiert machen. Für lockiges Haar, das sowohl Pflege als auch Definition benötigt, ist das Curl Set die bessere Wahl. Suchen Sie nur Schadensreparatur ohne spezielle Curl-Fokussierung, ist das Hair Repair Set eine gute Alternative.
Was ist der Unterschied zwischen der Curl-Version und den normalen Nr. 4 und Nr. 5?
Die normalen Olaplex Nr. 4 und Nr. 5 sind für alle Haartypen konzipiert und konzentrieren sich vor allem auf Schadensreparatur. Sie wirken gut, sind aber nicht speziell auf die Bedürfnisse von lockigem Haar abgestimmt. Die Curl-Versionen haben eine reichhaltigere, cremigere Textur, die besser zu den Anforderungen von Locken passt: mehr Feuchtigkeit, weniger Krause und bessere Lockenbildung. Das Olaplex Curl Set No. 4 en No. 5 - 2X250ml ist also nicht Simpelweg dasselbe Produkt mit anderem Etikett. Bei lockigem Haar ist die Curl-Version die logischere Wahl.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Hilft das Olaplex Curl Set No. 4 en No. 5 - 2X250ml bei blondiertem Haar?
Ja. Beide Produkte reparieren die im Haar durch Blondierung oder Hitze gebrochenen Verbindungen. Ihr Haar fühlt sich danach kräftiger an und bricht beim Kämmen weniger schnell. Für eine Olaplex Curl Shampoo Bewertung suchen viele nach Erfahrungen von Menschen mit gefärbtem oder blondiertem lockigem Haar, die überwiegend positiv über die Kombination aus Reparatur und Lockenpflege berichten.
Wie oft kann ich das Olaplex Curl Set verwenden?
Sie können das Set bei jeder Wäsche anwenden. Haben Sie Locken, die empfindlich auf zu viel Pflege oder Protein reagieren? Dann verwenden Sie das Set zwei- bis dreimal pro Woche und wechseln mit einem leichteren Shampoo ab. Wenn Sie Olaplex No 4 Curl Shampoo kaufen möchten und Ihr Haar bereits stark beschwert oder schlaff ist, starten Sie langsam und beobachten Sie die Reaktion Ihres Haares.
Sind die Produkte Siliconfrei und für die Curly Girl-Methode geeignet?
Ja, beide Produkte sind sulfatfrei und Siliconfrei. Damit passen sie zur Curly Girl-Methode. Möchten Sie Erfahrungen mit Olaplex Curl Conditioner von Anwenderinnen der CG-Methode lesen? Auf Reddit und bei Händlern finden Sie zahlreiche positive Erfahrungsberichte von Locken Typ 2 bis 4, die das Set fest in ihre Waschroutine integriert haben.
Weitere Informationen
Herstellerkontakt:
Obelis s.a
Bd Général Wahis 53
1030 Brüssel
Belgien
[email protected]
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 17 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Good introduction, but outdated now with Godot 4
Format: Kindle
It was a great introduction to Godot 3, but now after Godot 4 is out, the water plugin doesn’t work anymore used in the book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2024
★★★★★ 2
Good, but only for complete beginners who haven’t seen the tutorials on the Godot website
Format: Kindle
Skippable with free tutorials found on the web both from official and unofficial resources. A good starting block for those who are completely new to the concept and want to get started with Godot.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 31, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Superbly written, relatable, important, and humanistic
Format: Hardcover
I purchased the hardback of this book when I heard that Meta was trying to block its publication. And I’m so glad I did. The book was a jaw-dropping, gripping read that held me in a trance.
It’s my understanding that the legal efforts on Meta’s part to have the book blocked have only made it more popular. After reading the book, I’m not surprised. Meta is run by short-sighted, narcissistic, and self-important people who often act like idiot toddlers. Mine. Mine. Gimme. Gimme. Cake. More. More.
Once I received the book, I was reluctant to dive in, thinking it would be a challenging read with technology and boring stuff, but I was wrong with that assessment. The book is superbly written, relatable, and humanistic, and made me proud of Sarah for her bravery in becoming a whistleblower. A New Zealand native, Sarah is a lawyer who worked as a diplomat for the United Nations before doggedly selling herself on the staff at Facebook for a job within the organization that she felt could better the world. After working in the upper stratosphere echelons of Facebook for around six years, she has the receipts to prove that the dream of what it could be, became a nightmare.
She lays the groundwork for her assertions against Facebook/Meta building her credibility with the reader as she starts from her youth and before the hire. Eventually becoming an intricate player within the Facebook organization, she is a brilliantly smart person (and writer), and she struggles with the culture and personalities of the privileged and out-of-touch leadership who carelessly treat her not as a person, but as a tool. She is often in physical danger too! I was shocked at how often the top leadership - Mark, other top execs, and Sheryl Sandberg - could have cared less about Sarah’s pain, pressure, obstacles, and danger. Not to mention their ignoring Sarah’s wisdom and advice.
I’d heard of Sheryl Sandberg – she of the hot book – Lean In. As Oprah and CEOs and other high flyers applauded Sheryl’s awesomeness and her book, I recall at the time feeling intrigued, but super skeptical. See me giving a side eye to the situation and rejecting being given life coaching by a billionaire. It turns out my instincts were right. It’s easier to lean in when you have a staff of nannies, maids, cooks, toadies, and private jets. But she expects everyone to be just as work-driven and productive as her. If you’ve seen the great show Succession – think of the personal assistants portrayed on that show. Their job is to just do – never question – no matter how stupid the task or how impossible the ask. (Do you remember the scene on funeral day when Kendall Roy asks his fast-walking-in-heels personal assistant why she has a meeting scheduled with him and she says in a nervous sing-song – oh, we can talk about it then. He stops walking and presses her for an answer on the spot and she softballs intimating that she is thinking about making a change – and he’s pissed and says like thanks a lot for bringing this up today, my father just died. But she didn’t – he did…. Whatever. You cannot win). Another example. Think Meryl Streep in The Devil Wears Prada asking for the yet-unpublished Harry Potter books to be delivered to her children that the same day.
There is a story in Sarah’s book where while traveling in Mexico with the top execs, she gets a frantic call from her husband – there is a horrible situation going on at home in Manhattan with their nanny and the baby (for spoilers – I won’t tell you what was happening but it’s scary as heck). Sarah, trapped and traveling in a car, relays or shares the story about the in-real-time event, because . . . how could you not! Later, in her review, she is told that it was inappropriate for her to talk about her personal life and to basically keep her mouth shut and focus on the job. Lean in and keep your mothering and baby problems to yourself! And part of the problem with all this is that Sarah is not even an “assistant” – she is part of the team. But she is often treated like a body. Another time in a review they said she was ‘difficult to reach’ during the review period and she had to remind them that she was in an actual coma in the hospital. Still – they thought it pertinent and left the negative content as a strike against her.
I found the number of personal cruelties to Sarah abhorrent – but Sarah is not a whiner. No. She stayed because she believed in her work and the possible differences she (and presumably, hopefully? others) could make. But the world-changing greed on Facebook’s part to ignore moral and privacy issues, leverage people’s vulnerabilities, profit on the backs of victims, to control the flow of information, and have a pay-to-play mindset in working with an assortment of hate organizations, movements, and autocrats, and to take it further into doing whatever they want as long as they keep growing and gaining more users for their platforms changed everything. Meta is a world gobbler. A globe-stroking Golem who has Thanos power and it’s scarier than you know what.
And Facebook had FACEBOOK employees embedded in the Trump campaign to assist them in maximizing the algorithms and giving them whatever tools and access that others didn’t receive. Millions of dollars were spent targeting and spreading the thousands of Trump messages . . . saying God knows what. (Eating cats and dogs?) Harness the press. Harness the information sent to the masses. Pay to ride. Own the world.
I’m not sure how Sarah got away with publishing the book, but I applaud the publisher (and I’m assuming a team of lawyers) for going forward with the publication.
Read it. Learn from it. I have. But now what do I do? I use Facebook and Instagram– I need to for my business. Don’t I? Maybe Facebook will decide for me after some creepy search retaliates against me for siding with Sarah and for this review. A second is all it takes for me to go bye bye for some infringement or for breaking some policy I’ll never get an answer for.
God help us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 19, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Careless People: Power, Marketing, and the (Absent) Moral Boundaries at Facebook
Format: Hardcover
Careless People: Power, Marketing, and the (Absent) Moral Boundaries at Facebook
Sarah Wynne-Williams, former Director of Public Policy at Facebook, spent seven years at the company. In Careless People, she takes the reader behind the scenes of the world’s largest social media platform.
A hopeful mission
She shows how Facebook’s original idealistic mission, “to make the world more open and connected”, was quickly overshadowed by internal tensions, political interests, and ethical dilemmas.
Wynne-Williams began her career in the public sector. Driven by a strong sense of civic duty, she was initially enthusiastic about Facebook’s mission, but soon grew disillusioned with how things worked behind closed doors. In her book, she describes how commercial interests and the drive for rapid growth consistently outweighed (positive) social impact. This fundamental tension runs throughout the book.
Diplomacy, data, and dominance
The book offers a rare, and at times revealing, glimpse into Facebook’s international strategy. Wynne-Williams describes how the company organized state visits, attempted to build diplomatic relationships, and how many of these efforts ended in awkward failure. Particularly notable is Facebook’s push to enter the Chinese market, including Mark Zuckerberg’s personal effort to learn Mandarin.
Facebook’s leadership: no innocent bystanders
Wynne-Williams doesn’t spare the company’s executive leadership. She paints a picture of a culture riddled with sexual misconduct, power plays, and rivalries. The workplace environment she describes, full of intrigue, temper outbursts, and a striking lack of psychological safety, stands in stark contrast to Facebook’s carefully cultivated public image. This insight is valuable not only for those following Facebook, but for anyone seeking to understand how power and growth shape company culture in the tech sector.
Facebook as a PR machine
One of the book’s core revelations is how Facebook began to operate less as a technology company and more as a PR machine. Initiatives like internet.org were presented as altruistic, but in practice were primarily aimed at market expansion. The company’s role in political campaigns, notably Donald Trump’s election, is sharply laid out. The book illustrates how thin the line is between innovation and manipulation when user data is leveraged at scale for political and commercial gain.
Insightful, but not always credible
Wynne-Williams’ personal tone makes the book engaging and accessible. Her commitment to the mission, and her growing frustration, are palpable. Yet her constant presence as narrator sometimes undermines the story’s credibility. Dramatic anecdotes, coincidental twists, and strong personal judgments occasionally create distance, especially when the subject matter demands nuance.
That’s unfortunate, because the topics she raises, ethics, global power dynamics, and the impact on young users, deserve to speak for themselves.
Lessons for the future
What stays with the reader is how even the most powerful tech companies appear vulnerable when ideals clash with growth ambitions. The book shows how easily ethical boundaries blur when billions are at stake. For companies, policymakers, and marketers, it offers a confronting mirror: rapid growth and profit never come without moral cost.
Final verdict
Careless People is an accessible and insightful book that offers a unique perspective on the inner workings of Facebook and Big Tech. Despite stylistic shortcomings, a tendency toward dramatization, and a sometimes overly subjective voice, it’s a worthwhile read for anyone looking to understand the intersection of technology, power, and marketing.
Personally, I found it especially compelling because I’ve taken the opposite path: from marketing and tech into public service. That gives me a unique appreciation of the tension Wynne-Williams describes, the ongoing conflict between social ideals and commercial imperatives.
The book lacks objectivity at times, but it undeniably prompts reflection. And that alone makes it more than worth the read.
Rating: 7.5
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 21, 2025
★★★★★ 5
How Facebook lost its conscience, and how the young man at its helm grew to love the taste of power
Format: Hardcover
A WORD ABOUT THIS PLATFORM THAT CONNECTS US
Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams
This riveting memoir about the maturation of Facebook is fascinating in large part because of the direct access the author had for over six years to the highest levels of leadership at the company. Its title comes from The Great Gatsby, where narrator Nick Carraway says, “They were careless people, Tom and Daisy — they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money.”
A former New Zealand diplomat, Wynn-Williams had to pitch her own job to Facebook in 2011, as Zuckerberg and other senior leaders had no clue then about the role Facebook was destined to play in global politics. Rising to the position of Director of Global Public Policy, Wynn-Williams had a front-row seat to decisions that would irrevocably alter the political landscape in the US and around the world.
Fast forward to the 2016 presidential election and the author’s account of how Facebook’s microtargeting of users, its allowance of misinformation on the site, and its assignment of staff to work hand in glove with the Trump campaign as they utilized these ethically compromised tactics turned the tide in that election, and set the stage for the wrecking ball now swinging in our halls of government. You could say Careless People is the story of how Facebook lost its conscience, and how the curious and impressionable young man at its helm grew to love the taste of power.
The author weaves the story of Facebook’s role in the 2016 election with a number of other narratives, all revealing the same pattern showing how principled concerns were steamrolled by the relentless pursuit of growth, revenue, and influence. See also Cory Doctorow’s engaging review of this book, with its helpful explanation of why continued growth is so important to a company like Facebook. Her account reads like a slow-building tragedy, where you see exactly where the off-ramps were and watch, helplessly, as they pass by one by one:
The Rohingya Genocide
This is perhaps the most devastating section of the book. Wynn-Williams argues that Facebook failed to moderate hate speech against the Rohingya in Myanmar, and that the company only had two Burmese language moderators for the entire country. Facebook had also failed to invest in Burmese language support for its automated systems, meaning none of its moderation tools could even parse posts written in Burmese script. Because of these decisions, hate speech and misinformation designed to stoke ethnic and religious division spread like wildfire across the platform, and the genocide that followed is presented as a direct consequence of this reckless neglect.
Censorship for China
A chilling revelation for anyone who believes in free speech is Facebook’s willingness to compromise its own foundational values in pursuit of access to the Chinese market, which Zuckerberg seems to have perceived as a kind of final frontier and holy grail. Rather than standing firm on the principles of open communication it so publicly champions, Facebook secretly developed what was essentially a bespoke censorship tool designed to win over a Chinese government playing hard to get. If China had decided to allow Facebook through the Great Firewall, this system would have allowed Beijing to suppress content it found politically inconvenient, and would have extended into Hong Kong. One subnarrative in this thread is the lengths to which Zuckerberg went to court President Xi Jinping. He asks him (in Mandarin) to name his firstborn child (Xi declines), and the author includes an entertaining depiction of one-upmanship of Xi over Zuckerberg when the latter seeks unsuccessfully to arrange an impromptu meeting with Xi (since Xi had repeatedly rejected overt requests to meet).
Sexual Harassment Culture
For a company that spent years wrapping itself in the language of feminine empowerment and progressive values — most visibly through COO Sheryl Sandberg’s “Lean In” movement — the picture Wynn-Williams paints inside Facebook’s walls is a study in hypocrisy. The book alleges that sexual harassment by senior executives was not only tolerated but effectively shielded from consequences.
Monetizing Teenage Insecurity
Wynn-Williams reveals that Facebook identified teenage girls who had deleted selfies on Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, and then forwarded their data to companies who used it to target them with beauty products. Let that sink in for a moment. These were young girls navigating the minefield of adolescent insecurity, who made a conscious decision to take their photos down. And rather than respecting that decision, Facebook treated it as a data point to be monetized.
Content Moderation as a Political Tool
At the heart of this memoir is the question of how Facebook decides what speech is acceptable and what isn’t, both in the US and across the world. Facebook has spent years presenting its content moderation decisions as principled, values-driven calls — the careful work of a responsible company trying to balance free expression with public safety. However, the author shows, an internal policy established in February 2015 made the actual workings explicit: when governments requested that content be removed, Facebook would only comply if there was a credible threat to block the platform entirely in that particular country or a risk to its own employees. Numerous examples paint a picture of a company that was essentially making it up as it went along — complying with take-down requests when powerful enough governments (such as China) pushed hard enough, and ignoring everyone else.
Most of us have encountered, in one way or another, Facebook’s self-described “Community Standards,” which, the company states, “are written to ensure that everyone’s voice is valued.” “Facebook,” the language continues, “takes great care to craft policies that are inclusive of different views and beliefs- in particular those of people and communities that might otherwise be overlooked or marginalized.” However, the picture the author reveals in Careless People suggests that such language is mostly posturing.
Zuckerberg’s Ego and Detachment
One of the most fascinating and unsettling threads running through the book is the portrait Wynn-Williams paints of Mark Zuckerberg — a man who began as a socially awkward but genuinely curious young idealist and somewhere along the way became something different. One anecdote about Indonesia is comic in its brazenness: Zuckerberg allegedly demanded that Wynn-Williams organize an entirely staged, artificial mob of fans to “gently” swarm him in public, creating the illusion of organic, spontaneous popularity. His staff routinely let him win at board games on his private jet, and he remains oblivious to that fact until the author finally spells it out one day. After the 2016 election, when Obama dresses him down at the APEC summit in Peru about Facebook’s role in swinging the results, he becomes indignant, and instead of recognizing an opportunity for a course correction, he contemplates a run for president himself, instructing his staff to take him on a grassroots tour of the country that includes all the requisite stops for a presidential candidate. Throughout the book, we see a leader increasingly insulated from the consequences of his own decisions, surrounded by people too afraid or too incentivized to speak the truth to his face.
What makes the author’s account of this man and his company compelling is that initially she believed in the mission. She was there because she thought Facebook could be a genuine force for good in the world–a way to connect people, a uniquely powerful democratizing force. In that sense she probably stands in for most of us who are here right now because we recognized these same qualities ten or fifteen years ago. But now we feel tremors beneath us and the ground shifting in unsettling ways as we post and scroll and message here. What is this platform becoming? What are our responsibilities to bear witness to that and to respond? I believe this book can help us answer those difficult questions.
As a footnote, consider that when the book was published, Meta immediately filed an emergency legal action to prevent Wynn-Williams from publicly promoting it, citing a non-disparagement agreement she signed on leaving the company. The attempt backfired in the way these things tend to: the book reached number one on the New York Times best-seller list, and Wynn-Williams was invited to testify before the U.S. Senate. Meta’s attempts to disparage the author read as transparent and cynical in the face of the credibility she establishes throughout this book. And its efforts to limit her voice have only become additional evidence supporting the story she has told.
If you’re looking for a book that explains how we got to the crazy, upside-down world we are living in now — politically, socially, technologically — Careless People is a great place to start.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2026