SKU: 9368489492

François Baur Crémant d'Alsace Brut Réserve NV 750ml

Sale price$118.80 Regular price$132.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $33.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 22 - Jul 27

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

François Baur Crémant d'Alsace Brut Réserve NV 750mlIn 1741, a family named Baur put down roots in Turckheim a small, beautifully preserved medieval wine town in Alsace, wedged between the Vosges Mountains to the west and the Rhine plain to the east, whose wine culture is among the oldest and the most continuous in France. Nine generations later, Thomas Baur the son of Pierre, the grandson of Franois tends the same land, still in Turckheim, still farming the vineyards his ancestors planted in the

In 1741, a family named Baur put down roots in Turckheim — a small, beautifully preserved medieval wine town in Alsace, wedged between the Vosges Mountains to the west and the Rhine plain to the east, whose wine culture is among the oldest and the most continuous in France. Nine generations later, Thomas Baur — the son of Pierre, the grandson of François — tends the same land, still in Turckheim, still farming the vineyards his ancestors planted in the shadow of the Vosges, still sending sparkling wine into the world under the family name.

Those 27 acres include some genuinely exceptional ground. Half of the Baur domaine sits within the Grand Cru Brand — one of Alsace's 51 officially designated Grand Cru vineyards, located on steep, south-facing granite slopes above Turckheim that have been producing exceptional Riesling, Gewurztraminer, and Pinot Gris for centuries. The Baur family is one of Brand's largest landholders, farming alongside neighbors including Boxler, Josmeyer, and Zind-Humbrecht — a sentence that should stop any serious Alsace buyer in their tracks, because those are among the most revered producers in all of France. The family's remaining vines occupy the Herrenweg plateau, whose heavier soils add a specific richness and generosity to the wines that the leaner granite of Brand cannot supply.

Since 2001, every hectare has been farmed biodynamically — the approach Thomas Baur studied alongside Jean-Michel Deiss, whose Domaine Marcel Deiss is the most philosophically sophisticated and the most genuinely influential biodynamic estate in Alsace. Work is scheduled according to lunar phases, conducted at night while the vines rest, with natural yeasts in large foudres rather than commercial inoculation. The Crémant is the most immediately accessible and the most broadly food-versatile expression in the Baur portfolio — Pinot Blanc-dominant, with possible additions of Riesling, Chardonnay, and Pinot Gris depending on the vintage, aged 12 months on lees. The New York Times called it "dry and persistent with inviting texture and aromas of flowers and fruit." One reviewer scored it 91 points, finding it "rounded, fresh and superbly balanced." A bottle that tells you everything about where it comes from before you take the first sip — biodynamic Grand Cru neighbor Alsace from a family farming the same land for 280 years.


Origins & Craftsmanship

The Baur family has lived and farmed in Turckheim, in the Haut-Rhin department of Alsace, since 1741 — a continuous nine-generation presence on the same land that makes this one of the oldest winemaking families in a region whose wine history stretches back to the Roman era. The domaine currently totals 27 acres, split between two of the most specifically valuable growing sites in the immediate area: the Grand Cru Brand, where Baur is one of the largest landholders on steep, south-facing granite slopes alongside Boxler, Josmeyer, and Zind-Humbrecht; and the Herrenweg plateau, whose heavier soils add richness and amplitude to the domaine's lighter, more mineral Grand Cru fruit.

Thomas Baur — Pierre's son, François' grandson — has managed the vineyards and winemaking since 2001, the year the domaine transitioned to fully biodynamic viticulture. Thomas studied biodynamics in the same class as Jean-Michel Deiss — an experience that, in the words of one retailer who spent time with both, became "a religion to him." Work is scheduled according to lunar phases, often conducted at night while the vines are resting rather than stressed by midday sun. No synthetic chemicals, no herbicides, no commercial yeasts. Harvest is performed manually. Vinification takes place with natural yeasts in large foudres — vessels that impart minimal oak character while allowing the gentle oxidative development that distinguishes traditional Alsatian winemaking from stainless-steel-only production.

The Crémant d'Alsace Brut Réserve is produced by the traditional method, with secondary fermentation in the bottle and a minimum 12 months of lees aging before disgorgement — a longer lees contact than the Crémant d'Alsace AOC's 9-month minimum, producing the creamy, biscuity complexity that distinguishes Réserve from entry-level sparkling production. The blend is Pinot Blanc-dominant, with the addition of Riesling, Chardonnay, and Pinot Gris varying by vintage — the range of Alsace's classic white varieties contributing their specific character to a base wine defined by the freshness and aromatic expressiveness of the region's biodynamically farmed fruit.


Critics Reviews

Wine Casual — 91 Points:
"On the palate the dry, medium-bodied crémant displays green fruit flavors along with sharp tartness and supported by medium-plus, angular acidity."

New York Times (confirmed recommendation):
"Dry and persistent with inviting texture and aromas of flowers and fruit."

François Baur official (confirmed):
"Discreetly fruity freshness. Volume and delicate effervescence. A fine aperitif and a wine cocktail or perfect reception."


Tasting Profile

Nose
Pale gold with a fine, persistent perlage — the 12 months of lees aging producing both the color depth and the persistent bubble quality that distinguishes Réserve from simpler sparkling productions. Golden Pearmain apple fills the nose first with the most memorably specific and the most genuinely unusual aromatic note — not simply "apple" but the scented, honeyed character of the antique English apple variety that Grapes The Wine Company specifically identified. Pear and white peach add the most generous and the most immediately appealing secondary fruit aromatics. Croissant and biscuit add the most specifically and the most characteristically lees-derived pastry quality. Flowers add the most delicate and the most Alsatian secondary aromatic note. Lemon adds citrus brightness and freshness.

Palate
Creamy and fresh — the most consistently confirmed and the most specifically complementary palate quality, the creamy mousse of the lees-aged bubbles accenting the fruit's natural richness with pure lemon freshness. Dry, but not too dry — the Brut dosage leaving genuine accessibility without sweetness. Green fruit and pear carry the primary fruit character with medium body. Sharp tartness and angular acidity add the most specifically Alsatian and the most food-inviting structural quality. Shortcrust and biscuit flavors carry through from the nose as the most elegant secondary palate dimension, adding depth without heaviness.

Finish
Persistent and balanced — the New York Times' most accurate single characterization confirmed in the glass. Pure lemon freshness and the apple-biscuit complexity of the lees aging carry the close with genuine elegance. The fine mousse persists pleasantly, giving the finish a creamy, rounded quality that makes this Crémant genuinely satisfying as both an aperitif and a food wine.


Quick Overview

Category Details
Appellation Crémant d'Alsace AOC — Turckheim, Alsace, France
Style Brut Sparkling — Non-Vintage, Traditional Method
Variety Pinot Blanc-dominant · Riesling · Chardonnay · Pinot Gris (variable by vintage)
Producer François Baur — Domaine Baur, Turckheim
Family History In Turckheim since 1741 — 9 generations
Current Winemaker Thomas Baur (son of Pierre, grandson of François)
Estate 27 acres — half in Grand Cru Brand
Grand Cru Brand Neighbors Boxler · Josmeyer · Zind-Humbrecht
Herrenweg Plateau with heavier soils — richness and amplitude
Biodynamic Fully biodynamic since 2001
Studied With Jean-Michel Deiss (Domaine Marcel Deiss)
Viticulture Moon-phase scheduling · night work · no synthetic chemicals
Harvest Manual
Fermentation Natural yeasts · large foudres
Method Traditional method — secondary fermentation in bottle
Lees Aging 12 months (above AOC minimum of 9 months)
ABV 12%
Production 25,000 bottles
Critics Wine Casual 91 Points · New York Times recommended
Style / Identity Creamy, fresh, dry Alsatian sparkler — apple, pear, croissant, lemon, flowers
Aromas & Flavors Golden Pearmain apple, pear, white peach, croissant, biscuit, lemon, flowers
Bottle Size 750ml

Food Pairings

  • Oysters and shellfish — the producer's own first recommendation
  • Seafood and raw fish
  • Cold and hot starters
  • White meats and poultry
  • Brie and Camembert — the fine bubbles lightening the dense paste in a natural contrast
  • Goat cheese and soft cheeses
  • Quiche and savory tarts
  • Aperitif, on its own
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 9368489492

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 21 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
TigerSwan
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
works
Item Package Quantity: 1, Size: 100 Count (Pack of 1)
I work night shift and these keep me energize without jitters. Also, I do not crash. They last a good 6 hours and I'm able to sleep when I get home.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 1, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Anthony R
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 1
They don't work
Item Package Quantity: 1, Size: 100 Count (Pack of 1)
Used to work, useless now. It seems they reformulated things. I used to wake up on this guarana, and the most recent batch not only does nothing, I can take two and need a nap within an hour.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2026
P
Verified Purchase
Patrick Neary
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
This can be the best for some people and potential trouble for others. BP warning:
Item Package Quantity: 1, Size: 100 Count (Pack of 1)
It triggers my bipolar mania. Even though this detrimental effect is short-lived - only a few hours before coming back to normal... I don't feel right taking this ever again in supplement form. It's ok in a Monster Energy Drink or a Starbucks Tripleshot coffee or something for me personally. Really it's in my opinion the best herbal supplement for energy that is somewhat adventurous and flexitive. For me more like go outside and play, climb pine trees or something. In contrast, I'll suggest this term: "GNC-type herbal stimulants" - they feel more oriented toward focus and less towards locomotive behavior.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2025
C
Verified Purchase
Craig Matteson
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
This wonderful biography focuses on what the contemporary records actually tell us.
Format: Paperback
I am very grateful to Richard Bushman for this book. Writing about Joseph Smith invites a storm of criticism because skeptics only want him debunked and believers want their faith supported. Each wants their pre-conceived image of who Joseph was to be proven correct. Bushman takes a strong stance that lets the evidence we have speak for itself, preferably as close to Joseph himself and contemporary witnesses as possible, and tell the story of his life to high scholarly standards. For me the book read somewhat sparer than a biography that includes anecdotes as if they are history. Many familiar stories that I learned growing up are simply not here. However, relying as much as possible on contemporary accounts and what Joseph himself wrote or said provides a a biography more consistent in its view of Joseph than the books that either extol him or those that tend to attack him and try to debunk him. For example, the famous Brodie biography seemed to me to want Joseph to be both a genius and a dolt, a highly energetic man yet lazy, a crazed believer and a cynical con man, and on and on with similar contradictions. Bushman achieves a more consistent lens on Joseph, despite the complications of the man and his life. I think this is both a great achievement and a real help in trying to understand Joseph. I mean it as high praise for the book when I say that I think that almost everyone who reads this book thoughtfully will take away a broader and deeper conception of who Joseph Smith was and what he did. Rather than try to recount the book to you I want to share several things that I learned from the book and really value. I could list dozens more, but you can read the book for yourself (which I encourage you to do). Yes, I am a believing member of the LDS Church, but I think the book is intelligent and honest and complete enough to provide interesting and thought provoking material for both the believer and the skeptic and for someone who comes with no knowledge of Joseph at all. Believers will have to consider the complications of the man and his flesh and blood temperament and the misjudgments he made in his life about the people he trusted and some of the actions he took. Skeptics will have to deal with the reality of the man and his achievements. Simply dismissing him as a con man or a crazed visionary will not work because that is not what the actual evidence says. Joseph did not run the Church as the single central figure nor did he turn it into a cult of Joseph Smith. Bushman showed me the power and genius of the organization of the Church and its balancing mechanisms of being flat with a broadly held male priesthood with a hierarchical leadership with doctrine of keys and how the later addition of women in the operation, governing of the Church, and caring of the needs of the Saints strengthened and enriched it. And while Joseph was the President of the Church and its Prophet and Seer he really did let local leadership govern itself according to the principles taught through the revelations. I think Bushman's focus on the development of the organization and its role in preserving the Church and its ongoing growth after Joseph's murder is spot on and helped deepen my appreciation of its dynamism and adaptability. I also like the compromise language Bushman achieved in dealing with the realities of the revelations of Joseph Smith. The author always refers to them as Joseph's revelations. For believers, we accept them as revelations from God through Joseph Smith, but I can see them as "Joseph's" in that they were given through him. And skeptics who reject anything divine about the revelations can accept that, whatever they are, Joseph spoke them. I also liked learning how many of the revelations were given in the presence of others in meetings, how matter of fact they were, how they were immediately copied and circulated, and how difficult it was to get them collected and printed for a variety of reasons until we finally got them published as the Doctrine and Covenants. Another thing I gained a deeper appreciation of was the utter daring and the monumental nature of building the Kirtland Temple so early in the Church's life. Most Mormon congregations (wards) have around 500 members. Kirtland at the time they were building the temple was growing, but only had around 600 members when the project began. I can't fathom taking on such a project with so few people and for a people living in log structures and less it is even more incredible. Yet they built it in that rugged frontier town. I also thought that Bushman handled the sense of the miraculous around the dedication of the temple very sensitively. I also did not realize that when Joseph and Oliver were receiving the visitation of the Savior, Moses, Elijah, and Elias on the altar of the temple that up to 1,000 members were in the temple on the other side of the curtain. When I was growing up I did not understand clearly how early the Saints arrived in Missouri and how much larger the settlement there was than in Kirtland even though the temple in Kirtland was built and the proposed temple for Zion was not. Bushman also does a good job of giving a clear picture of the dynamics of the persecutions in Missouri and how the growing political power and anti-slavery stance of the Mormons antagonized the locals. The so-called Mormon War is also more critical to the rest of Joseph's life than I had realized. The constant hounding from Missouri and Joseph having to fear for his life from then on was something I had not truly appreciated. I also think Bushman handles the issue of plural marriage as well as it can be handled. And I think I gained a deeper understanding of John C. Bennett's role in the persecution of the Mormons in Illinois than I had before. I think the actual martyrdom is given a little too light a treatment here, but it is well covered material, and as Bushman notes, a great deal of faith promoting stories have accumulated around that event over the years. And I think he was probably wise in not opening up his book to attacks because he debunked someone's favorite story about Joseph's last days. Just laying out what is actually documented from the time is very helpful. Even with all the praise I have given, I could heap a great deal more if I had the space and time. But I do want to share an honest perspective I have of the book. It is superior, truly marvelous, from Joseph's early life through the dedication of the Kirtland Temple. That is the zenith of the book. From that point on, while good, the author himself cites difficulty in getting to Joseph directly after that point because his life and the nature of the work of the Church and the lives of the Saints changed. The rest of the book is not as exquisite. Very good, interesting, and informative, but not quite equal to the previous material. It becomes more of a narrative than it had been probably for the reason Bushman cites. I did find the footnotes and bibliography quite useful. They enriched my reading and sent me on to other reading I found illuminating and will help me in selecting other directions for study for years to come. So, I am especially thankful for the hard work in putting all that material together, as well. This is a monumental work and a treasure. Read it. Evaluate it for yourself no matter your present attitude or judgments of Joseph Smith. You will have a more considered and informed view for having read it. And, I don't know why this is in the paperback section. I bought and read the hardcover of the book. Reviewed by Craig Matteson, Saline, MI
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2012
R
Verified Purchase
R. Mckissick
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Candid Honesty from a great American Historian
Format: Hardcover
Reading Puritans to Yankees, a Bancroft Prize history, I moved to this tome. Professor(full) Bushman is a great American historian. This book follows tradition. One look at Prof. Bushman's on-line student sylabuses or awards at Columbia illustrates his leadership ofhistory students. Years I've spent trying to better understand ancient Pauls revelations; in particular the one with Christ on the road. How can one get closer to Christ without understanding revelation? At the third read of Rough Stone, and lots of redlines, I think this book is about revelation. Also what a rare thing revelation has been; heaven is open modernly for revelation. I wish I could understand the Bible without a guide to communicaton form God. Rough Stone has opened a new understanding of revelation. Maybe the most important thing is that God is all powerful and supreem, and will talk to us when He wants and we are able to understand. Bushman's honest facts include the unknown. Cited notes and end references indicate ratio of 20 to 1, focusing on issues not defense. His knowledge quest is aparent, like an intelligent friend who relates and lays out the reasons for his analysis. The evidence historians rely on, shows that Smith himself spoke and acted consistently with God. All true history I have read has good and bad - same here - the voice is one of personal knowledge. Whether or not you accept Bushman's conclusions on various issues, it is clear that Bushman himself has come historically to his conclusions. Very powerfull statement for an eminent historian. Dissecting a paragraph on prayer, washings and annointings leading up to the 1836 Kirtland Temple dedication is illustrative. After a summary, each person involved is organized into groups (priests, bishops presidents etc.). Concise background connects mental states. Bushman conveys the visions and revelations. Each hammered paragraph a razor sharp sword of truth, accompanied by the Spirit of Christ. May I someday write like this. This book does not attempt reader placement in contextual cultural affinity. The 1840's Latter-day Saints were persecuted, we are not. The Holocost Jews, read pogrom, are culturally atuned, and able to sympathize, we are not. Conveying instructions on getting revelation to unsympathetic readers like us was a challenge beyond comprehenson; study brings some understanding. Bushman has become sympathetic. His out-of-book descriptions of Lincoln defending on the Illinois circuit court clearly depict Bushmans cultural affinity. After three reads, I am becomming sympathetic. My wife calls me a bit crazy with the the 10 mile walks to Church, and baking bread from hand ground wheat, and almost loosing my job from sticking up for "no discussions of dating activities by the student interns at work". A good book should motivate action - maybe I should be less motivated (so she says). The highest recommendation, this is what I would give this book. I A guide to me, it sits with Bushmans other books and essays. I seem better able to understand conference talks. I listened to N. Eldon Tanners talk on Christ from the 147th conference (1982). He went over the first vision. But it became clear Tanner was talking from personal revelation, relating the 1832 description of Joseph Smith. Characteristics of revelation I learned reading Bushmans book jumped out at me during Tanners' talk.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2011

recommand products