Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Esme Patterson: We Were Wild - VINYL LPTitle: We Were Wild Artist: Esme Patterson Label: Grand Jury Product Type: VINYL LP UPC: 889326556442 Genre: Rock Release Date: 2016 06 10 Number of Discs: 1 Limited 'magenta with black & white splatter' colored vinyl LP pressing including digital download. 2016 album by the singer songwriter from Portland, OR. She began as a member of the Denver folk pop septet, Paper Bird, and has released two albums as a solo act including 2012's All Princes, I and
Title: We Were WildArtist: Esme Patterson
Label: Grand Jury
Product Type: VINYL LP
UPC: 889326556442
Genre: Rock
Release Date: 2016-06-10
Number of Discs: 1
Limited 'magenta with black & white splatter' colored vinyl LP pressing including digital download. 2016 album by the singer/songwriter from Portland, OR. She began as a member of the Denver folk pop septet, Paper Bird, and has released two albums as a solo act including 2012's All Princes, I and 2013's Woman to Woman. She was a featured writer/vocalist on Shakey Graves' album, Dearly Departed. She has performed on Conan, Leno and Letterman.
Tracks:
1.1 Feel Right
1.2 No River
1.3 Francine
1.4 Moth Song
1.5 The Waves
1.6 Guadalupe
1.7 Wantin' Ain't Gettin'
1.8 Come See Me
1.9 Wild
1.10 Find It
1.11 Yours and Mine
1.12 Alone
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 416 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Fits perfect
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Grey, Size: X-Large
This shirt is a perfect fit. I would buy it again in other colors.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Comparable to high end mens shops!
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Blue, Size: Large
Beautiful, heavy blue Oxford comparable to upper end mens store at 75% less! Full cut, great for casual wear or sending out for professional starching. Downside, no pocket, but I had mine monogramed wear the pocket would be and it looks like an expensive dress shirt. I bought more (with pockets) in blue & white
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Heavier fabric, very durable
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Grey, Size: Large
3 stars. Pretty nice shirt but the fabric is a bit firmer than i like. I iron it when i usually wear it so that it looks half decent since wrinkle resistance is low or poor. I usually have to use a higher setting on the fabric since the material is thick making it alot heavier. Overall great for the lower end cost, anything that beats it would probably be double the price. I work in a cubicle so this works well for me, a simple shirt, with a simple color.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
True to size, good quality, great value!
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: White, Size: Medium
Great quality! Amazing thick material! Perfect basic button down shirt!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2025
★★★★★ 4
No Shirt Pocket!
Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Blue Stripe, Size: X-Large
No Pocket! The material was nice quality, a little thicker than I would have anticipate for a low priced shirt, and very soft. The only disappointment was there was not shirt pocket. I suppose I did not look closely enough at the photos to notice that before I purchased. Otherwise, this is a very comfortable shirt.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 23, 2026