Pay in installments of $4.01 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
ZB4BK1243Main Range of product Harmony XB4 Product or component type Head for illuminated selector switch Product compatibility Integral LED Device short name ZB4 Bezel material Chromium plated metal Head type Standard Mounting diameter 22 mm Sale per indivisible quantity 1 Shape of signaling unit head Round Type of operator Stay put Operator profile Red standard handle Operator position information 2 positions 90 Complementary CAD overall width 29 mm CAD
Main
| Range of product | Harmony XB4 |
| Product or component type | Head for illuminated selector switch |
| Product compatibility | Integral LED |
| Device short name | ZB4 |
| Bezel material | Chromium plated metal |
| Head type | Standard |
| Mounting diameter | 22 mm |
| Sale per indivisible quantity | 1 |
| Shape of signaling unit head | Round |
| Type of operator | Stay put |
| Operator profile | Red standard handle |
| Operator position information | 2 positions 90° |
Complementary
| CAD overall width | 29 mm |
| CAD overall height | 29 mm |
| CAD overall depth | 43 mm |
| Net weight | 0.036 kg |
| Resistance to high pressure washer | 7000000 Pa at 55 °C, distance : 0.1 m |
| Mechanical durability | 1000000 cycles |
| Electrical composition code | M3 for <4 contacts using single blocks in front mounting with integral LED M6 for <2 contacts using single blocks in front mounting with integral LED and transformer M10 for <2 contacts using single blocks in front mounting with integral LED M4 for <4 contacts using single and double blocks in front mounting with integral LED |
| Device presentation | Basic element |
Environment
| Protective treatment | TH |
| Ambient air temperature for storage | -40…70 °C |
| Ambient air temperature for operation | -40…70 °C |
| Overvoltage category | Class I conforming to IEC 60536 |
| IP degree of protection | IP66 conforming to IEC 60529 IP67 IP69 IP69K |
| NEMA degree of protection | NEMA 13 NEMA 4X |
| IK degree of protection | IK06 conforming to IEC 50102 |
| Standards | JIS C8201-5-1 CSA C22.2 No 14 EN/IEC 60947-5-4 EN/IEC 60947-1 EN/IEC 60947-5-1 UL 508 EN/IEC 60947-5-5 JIS C8201-1 |
| Product certifications | DNV UL listed RINA LROS (Lloyds register of shipping) CSA GL BV |
| Vibration resistance | 5 gn (f= 2…500 Hz) conforming to IEC 60068-2-6 |
| Shock resistance | 30 gn (duration = 18 ms) for half sine wave acceleration conforming to IEC 60068-2-27 50 gn (duration = 11 ms) for half sine wave acceleration conforming to IEC 60068-2-27 |
Offer Sustainability
| Sustainable offer status | Green Premium product |
| REACh Regulation | REACh Declaration |
| EU RoHS Directive | Pro-active compliance (Product out of EU RoHS legal scope) EU RoHS Declaration |
| Toxic heavy metal free | Yes |
| Mercury free | Yes |
| RoHS exemption information | Yes |
| China RoHS Regulation | China RoHS declaration |
| Environmental Disclosure | Product Environmental Profile |
| Circularity Profile | End of Life Information |
Contractual warranty
| Warranty | 18 months |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 29 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great Comfortable pants
I was expecting a pair, cheap polyester pants but was very surprised by the quality. And the perfect fit on these pants. Going back to get 2 more pairs. Love them, wear I them to work.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Good Fit
Bought for a wedding for my husband he looked good an felt comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Didn’t last as long as I had hoped
Pants were okay for a returned item, but certainly not the best. They lasted a few months before defects got worse. Probably will convince me to just buy new all the time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Best Pants I've Ever Owned!!
Size: 44W x 34L Big Tall, Color: Navy Blazer
There is not a bad thing to say about these pants. They look great (I get compliments all the time, as well as people asking for information on them), feel great, are super comfortable, and are actually quite durable. I own these in blue and gray and they are by far my favorite pants to where to work. They work for both business-casual, as well as business-formal dress-codes. Buy these pants!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Fits Fine, Looks Great, Sizing Makes No Sense
Size: 16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: White, Size: 16.5" Neck 32"-33" Sleeve, Color: White
I hate shopping for dress shirts. For me, at least, it is a thoroughly frustrating experience, mostly because there's no consistency at all to the sizing. Actually, that's not quite true: dress shirts consistently DON'T FIT ME PROPERLY, which means I have to look at a lot of shirts and scrutinize size charts - which are usually incomplete, when they're provided at all - before finally finding The One. And sometimes, like this time, I don't manage to find The One. But this shirt comes close, as I will explain.
The problem stems from my physique, which I never thought of as unique, but here it is: I'm short (just under 5'4", with a 40-41" chest, a little extra weight (so my middle is about the same), a 36" waist, 33" arms when measured the traditional way (more on that later) and a 16" neck. That last measurement is the single biggest problem: most shirt manufacturers apparently think that if you have a 16' neck, you are shaped like Omar the Tentmaker. Van Heusen is no exception. Note that this shirt is listed as "fitted". Now, that's a completely amorphous descriptor, which, I suppose, is true for most shirt fit descriptors these days. But if you look at Van Heusen's "regular" fit shirts, you'll find that they think if you have a 16" neck, you must have a nearly 50" chest and your waist is over 45". That's not regular, that's freakin' portly! I was afraid to even look at any of their Big & Tall men's dress shirts -- if their idea of regular fit was this skewed, then I didn't want to know what they think Big & Tall is. Thankfully, this is a "fitted" shirt, so Van Heusen thoughtfully provides the 16" neck version with a 42-44" chest and 36-38" waist. That's the size I bought, and it actually fits me pretty well. Still a little loose for a "fitted" shirt, but it doesn't look baggy, and that's what I was after. But a little more realism in the size descriptions would be greatly appreciated.
Regarding the sleeve length, I really don't know what's up. I've seen charts that tell you how to measure it, but no matter how I measure it, I never manage to come up with any of the sleeve lengths provided on size charts. I have noticed that there appear to be two ways of measuring it, though. One way, which I call the traditional way because it seems to have been around longer, starts the measurement somewhere between the edge of the shoulder and the neck. At least, I think that's where it starts -- approximately. As I said before, I never manage to come up with the same number. But by this measurement, my correct sleeve length is 32-33", and the average guy's is probably 34-35". In the last year or so, when I shopped for shirts, I found some size charts using a different method, because the numbers were a lot lower, anywhere from 22" to 28". I have no idea where they came up with that measurement, nor do I know what mine is by this method, because the shirts I ended up buying so far have all used what I referred to as the traditional method.
Anyway, the shirt looked quite nice on me, right out of the package, and continues to look quite nice on me after a couple of washings. The photo I attached is what the shirt looked like after being washed twice. I wash my shirts on my machine's Delicate cycle and hang them to dry. When cared for this way, the shirt does a pretty good job of living up to the listing's claim of wrinkle resistance. It doesn't come out perfectly smooth and crisp, but it looks good enough that I don't feel inclined to iron it.
I decided on a poplin shirt because I was shopping for a summer-weight shirt that would breathe well. But poplin shirts proved nonexistent in my local stores, and not all that plentiful online. Poplin shirts listed online with full size charts so I could tell whether or not they might fit me were nearly as hard to find as igloos in the Mojave Desert, and poplin shirts whose size charts indicated that they were available with dimensions that would actually fit me were somewhere between that and hen's teeth. Needless to say, I was thrilled when I found this one. But the composition of poplin appears to be open to some interpretation. I own a few poplin business shirts (which I wear without suits and ties), and upon receiving my new Van Heusen shirts, it seemed to me that my poplin business shirts were lighter and breathed better. But then it occurred to me that shirt manufacturers often treat their material with coatings that improve the luster and crispness of their shirts for display purposes, and such coatings might be why my new shirts felt stiff, heavy and not particularly airy. Not wanting to give up and send the new shirts back, I decided to take a risk and launder them to see if that improved the feel. Thankfully, it did. After two washings, my new shirts are less shiny than delivered (which I'm fine with), a lot less stiff and breathe reasonably well.
So... these shirts fit well, look good and feel good. Check, check and check. That means I'm fully satisfied with them, right? Wrong -- I am NOT fully satisfied with them. It's summertime. Summertime where I live is hot and often quite humid. I wanted shirts appropriate for that weather. To me, that has always meant lightweight broadcloth short-sleeve shirts. But it seems that today's Fashion Police have decreed that there is no longer such a thing as a short-sleeve dress shirt. They have decreed that today's well-dressed men must wear heavy cotton, long-sleeve shirts year-round. Well, excuse me for living, but some of us perspire when dressed that way in summer heat. Poplin shirts were presented to me as the compromise between acceptable modern fashion and comfort. Linen shirts were also recommended, but I couldn't find a single linen shirt what didn't have a crinkly, casual finish, much less one that was intended to be worn with a tie. With extreme effort, I found a poplin shirt that fits well, and I bought two of them, but while they are more comfortable in the sticky summer heat than heavy cotton, they are NOT as comfortable as my old short-sleeve dress shirts. I want new short-sleeve dress shirts, dagnab it! But until I successfully identify and locate all those insane Fashion Police, blow up their air conditioners and confine them to a Chicago Summer Simulator (otherwise known as a sauna) for three days in their heavy cotton shirts so that they will once again bless the manufacture of short-sleeve dress shirts, I guess these Van Heusen fitted long-sleeve poplin shirts will have to do.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 30, 2024