SKU: 41775934705

Yukon Gear Steel Spool For Dana 44 w/ 30 Spline Axles / 3.92+

$164.69 $182.99
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on airconspareparts.com >

Pay in installments of $45.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 22 - Jul 27

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Yukon Gear Steel Spool For Dana 44 w/ 30 Spline Axles / 3.92+Yukon Performance steel spool for Dana 44 with 30 spline axles. fits 3. 92 and up. Yukon performance spools are made from the highest quality materials to ensure high strength and long life in performance applications. Spools provide 100% power to both tires at all times and are a lower cost alternative to lockers. Spools are not recommended for street driven vehicles. Yukon Performance spools come with a one year warranty against manufacturing

Yukon Performance steel spool for Dana 44 with 30 spline axles. fits 3.92 and up. Yukon performance spools are made from the highest quality materials to ensure high strength and long life in performance applications. Spools provide 100% power to both tires at all times and are a lower cost alternative to lockers. Spools are not recommended for street driven vehicles. Yukon Performance spools come with a one year warranty against manufacturing defects.

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1969-1974 Chevrolet Blazer Base
1967-1968 Chevrolet C10 Pickup Base
1993-1994 Chevrolet Camaro Base
1984-1985 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
1993 Chevrolet Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car
1985 Chevrolet Camaro Iroc-Z
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Heritage Edition
1984-1985 Chevrolet Camaro Sport
1984-1985,1992-1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Heritage Edition
1967,1969-1972 Chevrolet G10 Van Base
1968-1972 Chevrolet G10 Van Sportvan
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Cheyenne
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Custom Deluxe
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Scottsdale
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Silverado
1960-1974 Chevrolet K10 Pickup Base
1967-1974 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Base
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Custom Deluxe
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Scottsdale
1975-1977,1979-1980 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Silverado
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Cheyenne
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Custom Deluxe
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Scottsdale
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Silverado
1962-1974 Chevrolet K20 Pickup Base
1967-1974 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Base
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Custom Deluxe
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Scottsdale
1975-1977,1979-1980 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Silverado
1977-1980 Chevrolet K30 Cheyenne
1977-1980 Chevrolet K30 Custom Deluxe
1977-1980 Chevrolet K30 Scottsdale
1977-1980 Chevrolet K30 Silverado
1968-1974 Chevrolet K30 Pickup Base
1976 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Base
1975-1980 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Cheyenne
1975,1977-1980 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Custom Deluxe
1978,1980 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
1960-1966 Chevrolet Suburban Base
1994-2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Base
1974-1993 Dodge Ramcharger Base
1991-1993 Dodge Ramcharger Canyon Sport
1981-1993 Dodge Ramcharger Royal SE
1975-1980 Dodge Ramcharger SE
1975-1977,1984-1989 Dodge W100 Custom
1968-1974 Dodge W100 Pickup Base
1960-1967 Dodge W100 Series Base
1977-1993 Dodge W150 Base
1990-1991 Dodge W150 S
1975-1980 Dodge W200 Base
1968-1974 Dodge W200 Pickup Base
1960-1967 Dodge W200 Series Base
1981-1993 Dodge W250 Base
1971-1974 Ford Bronco Base
1975-1979 Ford Bronco Custom
1975,1978 Ford Bronco Northland
1975 Ford Bronco Ranger
1978-1979 Ford Bronco Ranger XLT
1975-1977 Ford Bronco Sport
1971-1973 Ford Bronco Wagon
1969-1975 Ford E-100 Econoline Base
1975 Ford E-100 Econoline Chateau
1969-1974 Ford E-100 Econoline Club Wagon
1975 Ford E-100 Econoline Custom
1975 Ford E-100 Econoline Northland
1975-1979 Ford E-150 Econoline Base
1975-1979 Ford E-150 Econoline Chateau
1975-1979 Ford E-150 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-150 Econoline Northland
1953-1974,1976-1978 Ford F-100 Base
1975-1979 Ford F-100 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-100 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-100 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-100 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-100 Ranger XLT
1977 Ford F-100 XLT
1976-1978 Ford F-150 Base
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-150 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-150 Ranger XLT
1977 Ford F-150 XLT
1959-1974,1976-1978 Ford F-250 Base
1975-1979 Ford F-250 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-250 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-250 Ranger XLT
1977 Ford F-250 XLT
1979 Ford F-350 Custom
1979 Ford F-350 Ranger
1979 Ford F-350 Ranger Lariat
1979 Ford F-350 Ranger XLT
1967-1968 GMC C15/C1500 Pickup Base
1967,1970-1971 GMC G15/G1500 Van Base
1968-1969,1971-1972 GMC G15/G1500 Van Rally
1968-1972 GMC G15/G1500 Van Vandura
1964-1966 GMC G1500 Base
1975-1978 GMC K15 Base
1975-1978 GMC K15 High Sierra
1977 GMC K15 Indy Hauler
1975-1978 GMC K15 Sierra Classic
1975-1978 GMC K15 Sierra Grande
1975-1978 GMC K15 Suburban Base
1975-1978 GMC K15 Suburban High Sierra
1975-1978 GMC K15 Suburban Sierra Classic
1975-1978 GMC K15 Suburban Sierra Grande
1966-1974 GMC K15/K1500 Pickup Base
1967-1974 GMC K15/K1500 Suburban Base
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Base
1979-1980 GMC K1500 High Sierra
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Sierra Classic
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Sierra Grande
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Suburban Base
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Suburban High Sierra
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Suburban Sierra Classic
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Suburban Sierra Grande
1975-1978 GMC K25 Base
1975-1978 GMC K25 High Sierra
1975-1978 GMC K25 Sierra Classic
1975-1978 GMC K25 Sierra Grande
1975-1978 GMC K25 Suburban Base
1975-1978 GMC K25 Suburban High Sierra
1975-1978 GMC K25 Suburban Sierra Classic
1975-1978 GMC K25 Suburban Sierra Grande
1967-1974 GMC K25/K2500 Pickup Base
1967-1974 GMC K25/K2500 Suburban Base
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Base
1979-1980 GMC K2500 High Sierra
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Sierra Classic
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Sierra Grande
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Suburban Base
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Suburban High Sierra
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Suburban Sierra Classic
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Suburban Sierra Grande
1960-1966 GMC Suburban Base
1968-1971 International Scout Base
1971-1974,1976-1980 International Scout II Base
1978-1979 International Scout II SS2
1976-1980 International Scout II Terra
1976-1980 International Scout II Traveler
1975 International Scout II XLC
1993-1997 Isuzu Rodeo LS
1993-1997 Isuzu Rodeo S
1986-1993 Jeep Cherokee Base
1991-1992 Jeep Cherokee Briarwood
1986-1988 Jeep Cherokee Chief
1993 Jeep Cherokee Country
1986-1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo
1987-1992 Jeep Cherokee Limited
1986-1990 Jeep Cherokee Pioneer
1989-1993 Jeep Cherokee Sport
1960-1983 Jeep CJ5 Base
1977-1980 Jeep CJ5 Golden Eagle
1980-1983 Jeep CJ5 Laredo
1982-1983 Jeep CJ5 Limited
1975-1983 Jeep CJ5 Renegade
1966-1975 Jeep CJ6 Base
1976-1986 Jeep CJ7 Base
1977-1979 Jeep CJ7 Golden Eagle
1980 Jeep CJ7 Golden Hawk
1980-1983,1985-1986 Jeep CJ7 Laredo
1982-1983 Jeep CJ7 Limited
1976-1986 Jeep CJ7 Renegade
1987-1992 Jeep Comanche Base
1987-1988 Jeep Comanche Chief
1986 Jeep Comanche Custom
1990-1992 Jeep Comanche Eliminator
1987-1988 Jeep Comanche Laredo
1987-1992 Jeep Comanche Pioneer
1986 Jeep Comanche X
1986 Jeep Comanche XLS
1966-1973 Jeep Commando Base
1984-1991,1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Base
1984-1985 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Limited
1974-1988 Jeep J10 Base
1981-1986 Jeep Scrambler Base
1985-1986 Jeep Scrambler Laredo
1985-1986 Jeep Scrambler Renegade
1982-1983 Jeep Scrambler SL
1982-1984 Jeep Scrambler SR
1971-1982,1984-1987 Jeep Wagoneer Base
1982-1983 Jeep Wagoneer Brougham
1973-1976 Jeep Wagoneer Custom
1979-1990 Jeep Wagoneer Limited
2006 Jeep Wrangler 65th Anniversary Edition
2003-2006 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon
1997-2004 Jeep Wrangler Sahara
1997-2006 Jeep Wrangler SE
1997-2006 Jeep Wrangler Sport
2004-2006 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited
2005-2006 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon
2002-2006 Jeep Wrangler X
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 41775934705

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 17 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
W
Verified Purchase
William M. Victor
Draper, US
★★★★★ 4
Thoughtful book on the purpose of the Creation accounts
Format: Paperback
This book provides a very good introduction into how the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) was most likely formed. It takes very seriously the environment that may have shaped the Pentateuch. It also provides a good primer into how Paul read the Hebrew Bible: through the lens of the death and resurrection of Jesus. If the reader of the Bible understands the purpose behind the creation narratives then there appears to be less conflict with scientific explanations for the origins of the universe and even humanity. I was expecting this book to do something that Enns never claims he was setting out to do, that is give an alternative understanding of the origins of sin and death while taking Paul's account in Romans 5 seriously. Enns claims that Paul interpreted the Adam story in a way that he interpreted other accounts of the Hebrew Bible, through a Christological lens but with little regard to historical context. To Enns, Paul was a man of his time and just because Paul, a man uninformed by scientific explanations of the universe, understood Adam as a historical person doesn't mean those of us who are informed need to see it the same way. Enns values Paul's Christocentric lens on the Hebrew Bible, but comes just short of calling Paul wrong on his understanding of the origin of sin and death. If you are working through the issue of integration/synthesizing scientific thoughts on the origins of the universe and humanity (as well as trying to come to grips with the purpose of the Creation accounts in Genesis) this book will serve you well. If you are expecting Enns to provide that integration/synthesis for you, you will be disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark A. Chenoweth
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Enns' view of Adam will eventually dominate in the Evangelical academy
Format: Paperback
For years and years on end, I have been fascinated with trying to make Adam and Eve line up with evolution. I took a bunch of positions that I knew were ad-hoc but I didn't know what else to do at the time. One thing I couldn't figure out was why Genesis 1-3 seemed to be completely symbolic, yet Paul seemed to interpret it so literally. I read through Genesis 1-3 again and again and again. I picked up commentary after commentary. But the commentaries I read (other than Claus Westermann's-which is fantastic)seemed to make arbitrary jumps between interpreting the Adam story literally and symbolically. The attempts to literally interpret the story seemed to stem from a desire to stay faithful to Paul's reading of the story rather than from a desire to be faithful to the Genesis text. But shouldn't how Paul interprets the story be the final word on Adam for Christians? This is what The Evolution of Adam deals with. Paul's interpretation of the story in Romans and 1 Corinthians seemed to be a strange re-reading of the story...one that is overly literal. A talking snake? God walking in the garden? Every good Christian knows God doesn't have a body. So why in the world did Paul read this story so literally? It's this that Enns tries to answer. He shows us that Paul didn't intend to give us a historical critical exegesis of Genesis. Maybe Paul thought Adam was a literal person, maybe he didn't. This is beside the point. Enns shows that Paul was doing some pastoral reshaping of the Adam story along the lines of 2nd Temple Judaism to highlight the significance of Christ's death and resurrection. According to Enns' the "authorial intent" of Genesis 2 and 3 was of very little significance to Paul. Even if Paul knew (and there's good reason to believe he did) that Genesis doesn't indicate that Adam's sin has a universal effect on all humanity, he probably would have used the Adam story in the exact same way. Why? Because it was the best way to explain how Christ put Jews and Gentiles on an "equal footing." For Paul, Christ came first. Anything that could help explain the significance of Christ, even if that meant reshaping OT testament passages from their original "authorial intent," was fair game for Paul. And as Enns shows, it was also fair game for Paul's contemporaries. As Christians, we know we are sinners because we have a savior, not because Adam sinned. In the words of world-renowned Patristics professor and Eastern Orthodox scholar, John Behr, "We should not begin with a claim to know ourselves as sinful and then find a savior who corresponds to what we think our problems are...Christ provides the diagnosis of our condition and simultaneously provides the remedy." Enns' suggestions for the evolution debate are controversial among evangelicals, although they seem to be accepted by many Eastern Orthodox and Catholic academics today. Evangelicalism is a bit behind. Enns' book will provide for much discussion and will inflame reformed Evangenical fundamentalists like Albert Mohler. But his suggestions will ultimately be accepted by the majority of evangelical theologians in the next 100 or so years. I'm fairly sure of this. Although I'm Eastern Orthodox, Peter Enns' book is thoroughly orthodox, excellently argued, pastorally sensitive and ultimately game-changing for the Evangelical world. And although it seems many Orthodox are already talking Enns' game, to my knowledge, no one has written a book on the subject that actually tackles all the sticky exegetical issues. So Enns' book transcends the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox divide. One thing Enns did leave out is what to do with the genealogies in scripture that mention Adam. If you are interested in a discussion of these, check out Daniel Harlow's article online entitled "After Adam: Reading Genesis in an Age of Evolutionary Science."
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
A
Verified Purchase
AlbMonk
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Opened My Eyes to a New View
Format: Kindle
Excellent book. Entirely changed the way that I have looked at the origins debate. I have been a lifelong literal creationist for most of my Christian life. But, in recent years I have begun to question this view and look a bit closer at how evolution could in fact be reconciled with the creation story. And, this book has most certainly helped with this journey. "The Evolution of Adam" is broken up into two major parts with each part broken up into several more detailed subsets: 1) Genesis: An Ancient Story of Israelite Self-definition; 2) Understanding Paul's Adam. It is from these two parts where Enns believes he can establish an understanding about the Genesis story, Adam, and where evolution could fit into the story. Using textual criticism, Enns makes numerous conclusions based on both biblical and extra-biblical resources. Here are just a few that I have observed: 1) The Genesis account is NOT a book about origins, but a wisdom book about Israel's identity as a chosen people. Never did the Jewish people claim or believe Genesis was about the origins of the world and humanity. 2) Enns also surmises that Genesis was likely written post-exilic by the prophet Ezra at a time when Israel had lost its identity in Babylonian captivity and were seeking a renewed national identity that had been lost. 3) The Genesis creation story closely resembles numerous other creation stories of Israel's neighboring cultures (i.e. Atrahasis, Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh). 4) That Adam was a proto-type of Israel (i.e. loved by God, disobeys Gods command, and suffers the consequences, exiled from the garden/Babylon). 5) That Paul's Adam was explained in the context of 1st century Judaism and was using Adam as a mere metaphor and example of spiritual death for both Jews and gentile alike. 6) Adam could have possibly been the first homo-sapien that became aware of his spiritual nature, but hominids could have existed prior to Adam. 7) Nowhere in the Old Testament and Jewish history was Adam known to be the conduit for which sin became an inherited nature passed on to all of mankind. Where I think this book is lacking is where evolution comes into play. Enns spends most of his time breaking down and dissecting the creation story, but spends very little time building up the evolution process and how it fits in. Nevertheless, we cannot dismiss the science of evolution at the expense of taking the creation/Adam account literally. There is wiggle room in these two ideologies to allow for both God's divine creation and scientific evolution. Great book. Must be read with an open mind. If you hold firmly to creationism and believe it to be the ONLY way, then this book is likely not for you. But, if you are open to the possibility that Genesis is not a scientific book about human origins, then you may find this to be quite good. Enns speaks in such a way that this book is not too academic and easy enough for the average layman to understand. it is highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2014
W
Verified Purchase
West Virginia Born
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Very insightful
Format: Paperback
I am a materialistic atheist and I liked this book a lot. Perhaps that is why Peter Enns lost his teaching position! I certainly would not agree with Enns on his religious views but I found his scholarship & willingness to stray from closed-minded literalism refreshing. I learned quite a bit about Paul and his modus operandi in dealing with OT passages. I was presented a way of thinking about Genesis that transcended "it's just a metaphor" or "its just an ancient myth". Basically, my take home messages were 1) the Bible was compiled in its final form during exilic/post-exilic times though it contains some much older material 2) the OT was written as a means of self-definition & self-explanation for the Jewish people after the trauma of exile 3) the Bible is "incarnational", meaning both divine & human (those who demand it be free of its chronological & cultural milieu are being unreasonable) 4) God can "inspire" by stooping to our level & it's unwise to tell God what he can & can't do in terms of revelation 5) the Bible has no intent to be scientific and historical in early Genesis 6) Paul is a bigger obstacle to accepting evolution to many Christians than Genesis 7) by tying Adam & Eve to original sin & origin of death, Paul re-shapes/reinterprets the story in a way that seems foreign to OT writers 8) rejecting evolution means rejecting Pauline theology for many and 9) Paul, who also re-writes OT meaning in Abraham (faith vrs law; "seed(s)", uses Adam to put Jew and gentile on equal footing in needing grace/Christ's sacrifice/obedience for salvation. Christ, as second Adam, undoes damage of first Adam for ALL (Jew & gentile) willing to accept the gift of grace. Paul uses midrash/pesher arguments for his Christological interpretations with "creative engagement" of OT texts. Again, while Enns and I probably have very little common ground for agreement, I appreciated the book & was struck by this passage at the end: "...the light of science does not shine with equal brightness in every corner. There is mystery. There is transcendence. By faith I believe that the Christian story has deep access to a reality that materialism cannot provide and cannot be expected to know. That is a confession of faith, I readily admit, but when it comes to accessing ultimate reality, we are all in the same boat, materialistic atheists included: at some point we must trust in something or someone beyond logic and evidence, even if it is to declare that there is nothing beyond what we see." While I wouldn't agree totally with that statement, it strikes me as very honest, sincere & open-minded. Good book whether you agree or disagree with it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2012
K
Verified Purchase
Kathy Sund prescher
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013

recommand products

Celluloid Soul - Classic Fit
274.50
14Kt White Gold Peridot 1Ctw Earring
275.00
106-4471 GEAR-FACE
24.99
CBD Hemp Salve (1000mg)
30.00
Rajinikanth Thalapathi Stamp Tee - Classic Fit
249.50